Here is the relevant excerpt from “The Times” article… however they have misprinted the name of the company it should read: Bound4Bondage and not bond4bondage as written.
The Times publication date 20th November 2010, author Joe Joseph:
Melanie Stevens from North Yorkshire, on the Bond4Bondage stand, says: “…we moved into making bondage gear.”
Her husband, Darrell, a trained welder, handles that side of the business. Melanie attaches the leather restraints and rotating dildos. An example of creative destruction; though Schumpeter might have struggled to find a place in his theories for “Spot”, a man in a full-body Dalmatian suit who is crouching in a small kennel-size metal jail, made by Darrell. A friend of theirs? “No,” says Darrell. “He first came up to us at the show and asked if he could sit in our cage. I believe he even sleeps in a cage.”
…
Why shouldn’t people who want to slip stainless steel spheres the size of satsumas into various body parts not also be interested in the wellbeing of the great crested grebe?
Stroll around the Erotica fair and you’re unlikely to sit in a crowded train carriage again and not wonder what some of your fellow passengers get up to. But nobody thinks themselves kinky. That’s not how it works. The conjugation runs: I enjoy classy erotica. You crave porn. He’s a pervert who dresses as a Dalmatian.
Some people have said that the last bit of the article can be read in one of many ways… I’m hoping it was meant to be really written as :
The conjugation runs: “I enjoy classy erotica. You crave porn. He’s a pervert who dresses as a Dalmatian.”… i.e. as if it was a thought in a thought bubble as opposed to a statement of fact.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.